A Case Study

The last few weeks I have been contemplating music and how certain artists I in general like have released albums recently that either felt like the defining statement in the artist’s catalog or a regression from previous work.  I initially was thinking about the Kings of Leon’s albums from Youth and Young Manhood to Come Around Sundown, then Coldplay’s recent effort, Mylo Xyloto, which I haven’t fully heard but the reviews I have read suggest this is along the lines of X&Y, which was a disappointment.  So then I thought “why not listen to most of, if not all, of an artist’s music catalog and give my impression” (however lowly that impression really means in the grand scheme of things), which leads me to my “case study” ideas.

With these studies, my goal is to really hear how the band’s sound has evolved from album to album and give an assessment of where I think the band is.  I don’t want it to come off as a retrospective or some biography about the band.  I do, however, want to see how my interest in the band and music in general has evolved from the time the record first came out.  So, I thought I’d start with a band who I believe released one of the best albums so far in 2011 – the Foo Fighters.

Case Study:  Foo Fighters

The Foo Fighters have officially released seven studio albums, one live album, and one compilation album of their hits:

·         Foo Fighters (1995)

·         The Colour and the Shape (1997)

·         There Is Nothing Left to Lose (1999)

·         One by One (2002)

·         In Your Honor (2005)

·         Skin and Bones (2006)

·         Echoes, Silence, Patience & Grace (2007)

·         Greatest Hits (2009)

·         Wasting Light (2011)

I will attempt to be as concise as possible, but knowing me I will go off on a tangent about an album or seven, so bare with me.

Foo Fighters:  I remember when this record came out, which happened to be a little over a year after Kurt Cobain died and Nirvana ceased to exist.  Dave Grohl, the drummer for Nirvana for its biggest albums, was the ultimate drummer, and I wondered what would happen to him now that this gig was up.  I didn’t know that he had put together this hodge podge of songs, let alone played all the instruments.  For a debut, this is definitely a great kickoff.  As a teenager I was drawn to the energy behind each song, particularly the hits—“This Is a Call”, “I’ll Stick Around”, and “Big Me”.  “I’ll Stick Around” even had controversy surrounding it, with media and Nirvana fans wondering if Grohl was taking a swipe at Cobain in the lyrics (as I recall, ANYTHING that had something to do with Nirvana at that point was controversial).  Musically this record features some of the dynamics and volume that would be taken to new heights through the rest of their catalog (particularly their hard rockers), even if it wasn’t nearly as loud as future releases would be.  Lyrically the experience is sort of up and down; the singles were definitely the better lyrical songs of the set.  All in all, for any band this would be a tremendous start.

The Colour and the Shape:  Until recently, I felt that this was the best album they had recorded.  Unlike on Foo Fighters, Grohl was backed by permanent bassist Nate Mendel, drummer William Goldsmith (who would shortly after this record would be replaced by now drummer Taylor Hawkins), and frequent collaborator and guitarist Pat Smear (who also played with Nirvana).  This album takes dynamics, soft and loud, to levels far superior to the debut.  Cohesively this record also surpasses the debut, with Grohl writing most of the songs around a crumbling relationship.  Lyrically this is a great record.  Tie the musically dynamics to this, and you become emotionally a part of the music.  From “Monkeywrench” (a fantastic rocker) to “New Way Home”, the Foos made this amazing record that many fans and critics considered their best.  It certainly plays out of the speakers that way.  The best songs to me on this set are “Monkeywrench”, “Hey Johnny Park!”, “My Hero” and the ultimate “Everlong”.

There Is Nothing Left to Lose and One by One:  Stylistically these two records are somewhat similar, with the lineup now becoming fixed for the long haul (Grohl, Mendel and Hawkins recorded Nothing Left, Shiflett joined up on One by One) and growing into their roles within the band.  Both records maintain that musical blueprint that began on Foo Fighters, though they attempted to expand the sounds used on their records.  I like One by One; Nothing Left to Lose is my least favorite of theirs (ironically, Grohl likes Nothing Left to Lose but hates One by One).  Both albums had some great songs, but there were elements on the first two records that just didn’t feel like they were there on these.  Neither is lyrically up to snuff compared to The Colour and the Shape, though the highlights from each record (from Nothing Left to Lose, there was “Breakout”, “Stacked Actors”, and “Learn to Fly”; from One by One, there was “One by One”, “Times Like These”, and “Have It All”) are very good.  “Times Like These” in particular seems to hint at what the future would be like for the band.  To me the band seemed to stagnate a bit here, though their popularity continued to build.

In Your Honor, Skin and Bones, and Echoes, Silence, Patience & Grace:  These three records represented a bit of a departure in sound for the band.  While they still were very good with the hard rock tunes (“In Your Honor”, “No Way Back”, “DOA”, “The Pretender”, “Erase/Replace”, and “Cheer Up, Boys”), their exploration into softer dynamics expanded exponentially compared to their first four records.  There were a lot more acoustic songs, a lot more softer sounding songs.  All of Skin and Bones is an acoustic retrospective of their music, the bulk of which came from In Your Honor (disc 2 of that record was practically an acoustic affair).  Results were mixed on both musical and lyrical fronts.  “Best of You” is the best lyrical song from either record.  “What If I Do?”, “Miracle”, “Let It Die”, and “Long Road to Ruin” are all great songs.  What I worried about with these records was if the band was starting to lose its identity.  I loved them for their harder stuff, and that seemed to be taking a back seat for this softer side.  At the same time, I started to think that maybe by growing older and more mature they (particularly Grohl) were starting to think about their long-term legacy and that the progression could lead to better stuff down the road.  I thought about how other bands I love (the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, Eric Clapton, Pearl Jam, the Beastie Boys, etc) had evolved and how the Foos were evolving.  Something had to give.

Wasting Light:  When this record came out, I realized that my latter feelings were true.  This is my favorite record and, in my opinion, their best record.  They returned to the hard rocking they had done on Nothing Left to Lose and One by One though channeled the music through the melodicism of The Colour and the Shape and In Your Honor.  Each song is consistently good much like The Colour and the Shape, not hampered by the filler songs that had burdened all of the previous records.  The recording sounded more organic than it had on previous records.  Lyrically this is their best record despite not being as cohesive as that of The Colour and the Shape.  I can listen to this record from beginning to end and repeat and not tire of it.  The band plays to their strengths here, which is rocking and rocking hard.  My favorites on this record are “Rope”, “Dear Rosemary” (with Bob Mould), “White Limo”, “Arlandria”, and “Miss the Misery”, though I really like the majority of the record.  This is also their best reviewed record (not counting Greatest Hits).

Listening through their records, I better appreciate the progression the band has taken up through now.  While they have gone through creative ebbs and flows, the Foo Fighters have managed to sustain their excellence by staying true to themselves and releasing the music they feel best represents them.  They have also managed to maintain their sense of humor through nearly two decades of recording and performing.  They’re a great band that I hope continues to push themselves as they have.

End of a Band, End of an Era

After 30-plus years of writing and performing, R.E.M. (or its remaining members) posted yesterday that they were calling it a day.  Most people probably feel they should have called it years ago when Bill Berry, their original drummer and a strong contributor to the songwriting, retired to his farm in Georgia after having just had an aneurysm a couple of years before.  The band never really seemed to be the same after he left.  Sure, they had flashes of their rich history with songs like “The Great Beyond” and “Imitation of Life”, but I have to believe that at that point the remaining members—Michael Stipe, Peter Buck, and Mike Mills—were so busy with other projects and the loss of Berry as a regular member that maybe they knew like the rest of us that the fire was dwindling.  Even if Accelerate and Collapse into Now seemed to hint at a rebirth, the original four were still the best band.

I more or less have always liked R.E.M., so instead of mourning them, I’m going to praise them and thank them for writing music that has had a long-lasting effect on me.  Since hearing “It’s the End of the World as We Know It” on pop rock radio when I was eight or nine, I have at the least followed their material if not made an effort to buy their records.  I am glad I got to see them on the Monster Tour back in 1995, their first since they toured on Green in 1989.  Their music is as much a part of how I play guitar as that of the Beatles or the Stones.  Peter Buck’s chiming guitar is a part of my musical fabric.

Speaking of Monster, that album just might be my favorite of theirs.  Insane thought, perhaps, but when I think about the adolescent energy that went into that record, moving away from the thoughtful and mature Out of Time and Automatic for the People, I just get excited about the music.  “Crush with Eyeliner”, “I Don’t Sleep, I Dream”, “Strange Currencies”…these, along with many of the others on that album, were songs that I could crank up with them and just enjoy.  Not that I didn’t enjoy other songs the same way—“The One I Love” and “Driver 8” were similar—but Monster was that reintroduction that became an event.

R.E.M. released 15 studio albums, 10 compilations, and 3 EPs.  They also released 56 videos, most of which appeared on MTV when MTV used to be about music and used to show videos.  Their videos were events…the “Losing My Religion” video and song were played so frequently back then that I had to take a break from listening to them for fear of burnout.  They released some great material that affected a lot of people.  We should be praising them.  They had a great career as a band.

My Current Band Obsession

The Drive-By Truckers (further as “DBT”) are on my Metacritic list twice for Decoration Day and The Dirty South.  I really first heard them when I downloaded “Used to Be a Cop” as part of a free sample from Spin magazine back in March.  It’s a relatively long track (just over 7 minutes long), but it had a good groove and an interesting storyline.  Intrigued, I found two of their albums at my local library, Go-Go Boots and Brighter Than Creation’s Dark, and gave each a listen.  I also happened to hear “This F**king Job” on Outlaw Country around then, and my obsession kicked in.

What DBT has that other country/rock/country rock outfits don’t is their ambitious songwriting.  They have never feared from writing conceptual albums.  They have never feared from paying tribute.  Patterson Hood and Mike Cooley primarily write the songs with assists from a rotating cast of members, including Rob Malone, Jason Isbell, and Shonna Tucker.  They typically feature a three-guitar attack, and their sound is rock driven.  Their sound borrows a lot from bands like Lynyrd Skynyrd and the Allman Brothers Band, both rock powerhouse bands known for their country/blues/rock sound and powerful guitar attack.  I wouldn’t characterize the guitar playing of DBT as good as the aforementioned bands, but they’re certainly not bad by any means.

I mentioned DBT does not shy away from concept albums.  No truer is this than on the album Southern Rock Opera, which I’m listening to as I write this.  Southern Rock Opera is part tribute to Lynyrd Skynyrd, part historical reference, and all opus.  Some of it is fictional, but over the two acts the band tells the history of life in the South through the eyes of a fictional band.  Southern Rock Opera is an amazing record so far…probably my favorite of theirs.  You can tell through listening to it that Hood, Cooley and Malone put a lot of heart into this record.

More Rolling Stone Fallout

I know there are many people who will look at Rolling Stone’s “100 Best Albums of the 2000s” and think something along the lines of “all of these albums are great albums and deserving of being on this list” or “Get Rich or Die Tryin’ changed my life”.  People are entitled to whatever opinion they have, but sometimes in our music buying ways I think we place too much emphasis on an artist’s or band’s popularity and less on that artist’s or band’s art they’re releasing to us.  This list feels like the former.

I won’t deny that the Killers’ Hot Fuss deserved to be here; it does, because in the two years that followed its release the band released several killer singles (“Somebody Told Me”, “Mr. Brightside”, “Smile Like You Mean It”) and had an influence on a few bands that followed, even if the rest of the album didn’t reach the standards of those songs.  On the other hand, I have a hard time justifying Stadium Arcadium by the Red Hot Chili Peppers being as high as it was on the list (#74).  The Chilis have been a favorite band of mine for a long time, but even I can’t deny that their sound has been more or less the same since their last great record, Californication, came out.  Stadium was more about quantity than it was about quality to me.  There were few catchy tunes where I thought “Wow, they haven’t dropped a beat from Blood Sugar Sex Magix!”  Large chunks of it sounded like Kiedis was droning lyrics and Frusciante was noodling on guitar.  Had that album been edited down to one disc instead of two with the best tracks on the table, I would have argued the exact opposite.

I thought some of the album choices for certain artists were off.  For instance, the Rolling Stone list had Attack & Release (#83) from one of my current favorite bands, the Black Keys.  I like that album a lot (it did have “I Got Mine” and “Strange Times”), but if I were to choose any album of theirs for this list, it would be Rubber Factory, which had more quality songs (this could be a case where they selected the more popular album than the more artistic album, but I digress).  Another is indie band the Hold Steady’s Almost Killed Me (#99); I would have put Separation Sunday, which received better reviews and essentially started the trilogy of albums that created more buzz around them.  Beck’s Sea Change album (#17) was good but didn’t have nearly the popularity as Guero did, and Guero had better singles.  They put Electric Version (#79) from the New Pornographers in but not Twin Cinema.  Some stuff just didn’t make any sense.  And why in the world did they include Rated R (#82) from Queens of the Stone Age and not include Songs for the Deaf.  Songs for the Deaf single-handedly changed my opinion of rock music in the middle of the decade (I could love it again).

There were albums and artists I felt Rolling Stone did right in including.  Kanye West has four albums on here; two of them are landmark rap albums (The College Dropout @ #10 and Late Registration @ #40), and one of them didn’t get nearly the credit it deserved (808s and Heartbreak @ #63 kicked off artists’ love of auto-tune, for better and worse).  Jay-Z has his two best from the period:  The Black Album (#14) and The Blueprint (#4).  Radiohead has four albums here; Kid A is #1, and I have a hard time wrapping my mind around that.  Kid A was a good record but not a landmark record, especially for them.  I wouldn’t even put Kid A in the top four of albums they have released, let alone #1 on a “Best of” list.

I was also happy with some of the surprise artists on here—Amadou & Mariam, The Hives, Yo La Tengo, Elliott Smith.  The albums they chose for these artists (with the exception of The Hives’ Veni Vidi Vicious) I might take exception with to another better record, but those are quibbles.  Spoon gets Kill the Moonlight in at #51, and I was glad to see Britt Daniel and company get recognition. 

This all leads back to one of my points from earlier, which is Rolling Stone needs to commit to an audience (those infatuated with pop culture) and just leave the other audience to find their own magazines (the indies).  By trying to add a little color through putting some indie albums on their list, they think they can appeal to a wider audience.  In reality, they’re missing out on a ton of albums that more deserve to be on here than the Only by the Night’s and Kid A’s of the music world.  The more I read their lists, the more disenchanted with them I become.  I love their music coverage, but the lists are just conversation pieces, not recommendations for music to hear.

Why Rolling Stone Is a Screwed-Up Magazine

For years I have read and re-read Rolling Stone magazines, primarily for their music news and reviews.  They have lured me in with “Top” lists and “Best of” lists.  Some of these have been good; some of these have been garbage.  All in all, though, they’re still a decent source for music news, and some of their music reporters (David Fricke, Rob Sheffield) have written some amazing pieces on music.

I originally went to their website today to find an article about the Black Keys in the studio when I stumbled upon the “100 Best Albums of the ‘00s” (http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/100-best-albums-of-the-2000s-20110718).  Intrigued, I stopped my search and took a look at this list.  What I saw baffled me.  One comment spoke most intensely to me; basically the commenter said “no Animal Collective record on here makes this list basically irrelevant”.  After looking at the list, I think the commenter is right.

I have come to the conclusion, after reading through the list (including the captions with the albums), that the whole thing is about which artists were popular during the decade and what albums they released.  Basically, it’s more of a pop culture snapshot than it is a list of the best records released during the period.  I guess too much indie is a bad thing.  You have to give credit to the artists that actually sold a boat load of records (or digital tracks).  Oddly, the magazine tried to appeal to the readers that have an appreciation for all music, regardless of whether the albums were a commercial success or not.

Keeping in mind that the magazine’s editors have created a pop culture list while trying (ineffectively) to maintain one foot in the indie door, I decided I would comment on a few of the artists and albums listed here.  I’ll start with an easy one here—U2.  U2 is represented by three albums here: How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb (#68), No Line on the Horizon (#36), and All That You Can’t Leave Behind (#13).  U2 is a fantastic band; I have been a fan of theirs since I first heard “Pride (In the Name of Love)”, though I didn’t really appreciate them until Achtung Baby came out.  The three albums on this list are by far not their best records.  They’re not bad records, but these records are really only on here because of a couple of singles: “Beautiful Day” from All That You Can’t and “Vertigo” from How to Dismantle (why No Line is even on here I don’t know).  Those songs were EVERYWHERE—on Apple commercials, rom-com movies, and every other outlet they could force down your throat.  They had some great singles from those two albums, but the albums as a whole were spotty in terms of greatness.  To me, the only album that belongs on this list is How to Dismantle; that had more good spots than bad and better lyrics.

And here’s another question I have for Rolling Stone’s editors—why does every young band get compared to U2?  “Don’t call them the southern Strokes—call them the American U2” (in speaking of Kings of Leon).  “From the beginning, it was clear that Chris Martin and company had designs on U2-level stardom” (in speaking of Coldplay).  I suppose that speaks to the enduring power of U2’s music, but at some point we need to move away from those comparisons and just say “Kings of Leon used to know how to write good southern punk records but fame got in the way” or “Coldplay can’t seem to find its own sound and step out as the new benchmark for rock music”.  These U2 comparisons just reinforce the fact that there really hasn’t been much original music released in years.

Speaking of Coldplay, they, too, are represented by three records here: Viva la Vida (#85), Parachutes (#73), and A Rush of Blood to the Head (#21).  The only one of these three that should be on the list should be A Rush of Blood.  Viva la Vida is essentially a poor version of How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb sung by Chris Martin.  I know people get sentimental for “Yellow”, so maybe Parachutes could appear on the list, but maybe at the end.  A Rush of Blood, however, is a masterpiece to me.  I have no problem with its position on the list.  I played that record out for all of 2004.  That record might have been the only time I felt that Coldplay had their own sound.

As for Kings of Leon (another band represented with three records), a listener would be able to easily see a difference between their best record, Youth and Young Manhood (#80), and their famous record, Only by the Night (#53).  Youth is sex, drugs, booze and debauchery wrapped into three-minute Thin Lizzy tunes and plays extremely well from beginning to end.  Caleb Followill doesn’t sound like he’s oozing machismo here; his voice is ragged yet powerful in each track.  Night, though, sounds like an over-the-top PG-13-rated rom-com, with its ever-popular “Sex on Fire” and “Use Somebody” filling the airwaves (but the lyrics just not at the same level).  I like Kings of Leon, but they are the poster children for what happens when a band gets too much money and fame too suddenly.  Had they eased into this, I think we would be seeing the standard upon which good rock music is judged.

I will speak more to this on my next entry.  I can’t let it go.

Untitled Kurt Vile Follow-Up

So, I have taken a long break from this blog.  Usually I have a lot to talk about regarding music (mostly rock, but I’ll dabble into other stuff), but lately I have been so focused on my other blog I have neglected this one.  If I remember a long while back I said I would use this blog to review some newer records that aren’t on the other blog list, or at least other records in general.

For instance, right now I’m listening to Kurt Vile’s Childish Prodigy.  I read that Kim Gordon of Sonic Youth had this album as a guilty pleasure a few years ago.  Vile’s recent record, Smoke Ring for My Halo, has received strong critical attention, so I was curious what he was about.  Childish Prodigy is an interest record.  It’s not a bad record, but it’s not a great record.  He sounds like a screwed up Mick Jagger at times; some of his sneers are straight out of Jagger’s handbook to singing (by the way, Mick Jagger can still rock even though he’s almost reached Yoda’s age now).  Vocally he sounds like Mick Jagger, Leonard Cohen, and Tom Petty had a secret love child together.

Musically this record is quite intriguing.  It’s very raw.  His guitar work is very good here.  He’s experimental yet knows when to hone in and refine a concept.  He can be nasty one minute and sweet the next.  He mixes fuzzed out electrics with peaceful acoustics throughout the record.  I have felt awed one minute and violated the next.

Supposedly I should have listened to Ring for My Halo first, but I couldn’t get my hands on a copy.  Nevertheless, if you haven’t heard Kurt Vile’s music before but have seen him credited to a J. Mascis record or something else, check him out.  He’s an interesting artist.

Feeling Old Maybe?

Recently I stumbled upon an article that discussed a website/blog where the owner is trying to compile all of the video lists for every 120 Minutes show that aired on MTV (1986-2003).  Here’s the website:  http://tylerc.com/the-120-minutes-archive/.  Back in the day (for me, that means around 1991 forward) when I could catch the show I would try.  Back then MTV actually meant videos and interviews with artists/bands, but those days went out the door the day Pedro showed up on The Real World 3.  I used to like 120 Minutes and Headbangers’ Ball (less so Headbangers, though Beavis and Butthead did get me to watch a few more episodes) but didn’t get to catch either show as much as I should have.  Who knows where my musical tastes would have veered had I watched them more consistently.

Anyway, I’ve been “thumbing” through the website and have been fascinated by a few things.  One, there are a number of the bands represented on here that I still like immensely that I liked then:  R.E.M., Sonic Youth, Pearl Jam, to name a few.  I know Sonic Youth came out years before, but I remember seeing the video for “Bull in the Heather” on here.  Two, there are a TON of bands that I didn’t appreciate then that I do now:  Blur, the Cure, the Smiths, and Soul Coughing to name a mere few.  In fact, I hated the Smiths for a long, long time until a quirky romcom came out a few years ago ((500) Days of Summer) that reintroduced them to me.  Three, there are quite a few bands that were on back in 1991 that are still around now and are still relatively popular:  Social Distortion, R.E.M., Sonic Youth, and the Red Hot Chili Peppers, to name a few.  One could argue Social Distortion is more popular now in some ways than they were then.  Four, Trent Reznor let Pretty Hate Machine’s popularity ride out for years until he released Broken.  I’m blown away by this, because it felt like Pretty Hate Machine came out many, many years ago (in fact, it was originally released in 1989).

When I read this article and then found the website, I felt like this was a treasure trove.  At the click of a button I could locate songs and artists I hadn’t listened to in years nor could remember their names until now.  The nice thing about the site, too, is the links to searches for the videos (most of the songs have links).

Radiohead

I will be the first to admit that I don’t know nearly enough about Radiohead.  I have heard all of their albums except for their recent one, The King of Limbs, which isn’t even available on CD yet (but is digitally).  But I’m lacking when it comes to knowing their records, meaning knowing the names of the songs, understanding their background, etc.  At the pace I’m going with my album reviews blog, I will get to know.  I have been aware of Radiohead since “Creep” was a single all those years ago.  I can’t remember the first time I heard the song, but I’m pretty sure I liked it right away; I was an awkward teen that embraced the grunge message at the time and loved the hard churning guitars and loud vocals.  Radiohead embodied that with “Creep”.

But they changed the game with The Bends, which is why I am writing in the first place.  In terms of overall effectiveness/appeal/complexity, The Bends is probably in the middle of the pack of their records.  So why is The Bends my favorite record?  For me it’s the perfect branch between grungy Pablo Honey and the modernity that started with their best overall record, OK Computer.  The Bends contains a piece of every musical thought they have embraced in their long careers in some form.

Let’s start with “Bones”.  “Bones” embraces the arena grunge sound that started with “Creep” and became even more apparent with the numerous other Britpop bands that appeared just after “Creep” (Blur, Oasis, Primal Scream, etc.).  I love that it has this sound, that it bridges that part of them to the present and future.  “Bones” is probably the closest Radiohead got to the sound they had on Pablo Honey.  “Planet Telex”, on the other hand, with its use of guitar effects on pianos and guitars and other instruments, sounds more like a link to the modern Radiohead.

There are three songs from The Bends that really form my opinion about this album:  “High and Dry”, “Fake Plastic Trees”, and “My Iron Lung”.  First, about “My Iron Lung”, this song would be part of the branch to the modern Radiohead from OK Computer and later albums.  The chiming electric guitar figure played by Ed O’Brien, augmented by the sweeping to over-the-top distorted lead of Jonny Greenwood.  No, there’s no hint of electronic effects to this song, but the effects they used in the song alone would be featured more and more on OK Computer.

“High and Dry” and “Fake Plastic Trees” are the softer side of Radiohead and Thom Yorke at his most confessional.  These two songs alone launched the career of Coldplay, because they fit just as well in their catalog as they would in Radiohead’s.  My obsession with the sound of an acoustic guitar on record grew immensely when I heard these songs.  I always felt some electricity from the way Greenwood and O’Brien sounded playing and wanted to emulate it in my own playing.  I knew when I first heard these songs years and years ago that Radiohead was not the same band that had just released Pablo Honey a few years before.  They were older, more mature, and had embraced their want to create something with more depth.

“Fake Plastic Trees”?  It’s easily my favorite song of theirs of all their songs.  Why?  I don’t know, there must be some magical pull for me to it.  I think part of it is the emotional intensity of Yorke’s vocals.  I love the guitar work (all of it).  I like that he uses the words “fake plastic trees” to create a song.  There’s just a sincerity there that grabs my attention.

The Battle for Who Could Care Less

Ben Folds.  He is a pianist.  He is a vocalist.  He is a guitarist.  He plays a lot of instruments.  He’s been recording solo for over a decade now, having more or less disbanded the Ben Folds Five (a pity really…Robert Sledge is a killer bassist).  But most of all to me, Ben Folds is a showman.  My wife says he can’t sing.  Sure, he’s not Billy Joel or Elton John, but he’s not terrible.  I’ve certainly heard worse.

I heard Ben Folds Five’s “Battle for Who Could Care Less” and was instantly reminded why I love listening to Ben Folds’ music.  He injects fun into his songs in a way that some bands just cannot do.  I’ve unfortunately only seen him perform once, which was at the Big Shindig in Raleigh, NC, back in 1998, but I’ll never forget the scene.  The Ben Folds Five were the last band to play if I remember correctly, and they played many songs from their album Whatever and Ever Amen, which was in regular rotation for me at the time.  There wasn’t a song on that album I didn’t like, so to hear them live was a treat.  At the end the band jammed out, and Folds proceeded to stand up to play ala Jerry Lee Lewis and ultimately slammed his piano stool into the piano repeatedly until the music was over.  But in between the time they started until that destructive finale, I was mesmerized.

Listen to “Battle for Who Could Care Less” and tell me that’s not a fun song.  Or try “Song for the Dumped”.  Folds channels all these feelings that are all too representative of a male’s teenage and college years—getting dumped, dumping someone, getting drunk and trashing a party, being lazy—into many of the Ben Folds Five songs.  When he went solo, his lyrics were more mature and indicative of what an adult male would go through, but the fun hasn’t been lost.  He’s still got the adolescent rebelliousness in him (see “Bastard” from Songs for Silverman or “B*tches Ain’t Sh*t” off of Supersunnyspeedgraphic, the LP), but a lot of times that’s tempered by the reality around him (see “Gracie” off of Songs for Silverman or “Kylie from Connecticut” from Way to Normal).

You’re not going to get Lennon/McCartney here or Brian Wilson or other songwriters with an ability to write music that seems timeless with Folds’ music.  And I’m sure for some people Folds’ music will be too juvenile to try.  But I urge you to listen to him play.  Try to feel the energy that went into the songs.  There is something there in Ben Folds’ music that I think could appeal to just about anyone.

No new entry for my other blog, Music Meteorite Motion Player, but I did want to chirp a little about music.  I just finished listening to “Voodoo Chile” by the Jimi Hendrix Experience, which is a great record that I unfortunately don’t have the attention span to hear out.  However, I did today because I wanted to enjoy the virtuosity of Hendrix, who has always been one of my favorite guitarists.  I still like Clapton more overall, but Hendrix definitely was my first inspiration for picking up a guitar.

“Voodoo Chile” is a fifteen minute blues jam that soars in and out of the left and right speakers.  I remember I had a copy of the vinyl records way back when and reading the musicians that helped on this track, several luminaries in the business at the time and even to a degree now:  Steve Winwood on organs and Jack Casady (from Jefferson Airplane) on bass.  I had known Winwood for years at the point (“Roll with Me” was a hit in the household betwixt my brother and dad and me), and I knew of Jefferson Airplane.  I just remember being fascinated by the song, how Hendrix gave traditional blues steroids and feedback to create this epic track.  Muddy Waters would have been proud or was proud.

The song that followed is another long track, “A Pot in Which to Piss” by Titus Andronicus (from The Monitor record).  That track is a little more than half the length of “Voodoo Chile”, but you can hear the Hendrix influence in the track.  Granted, there are no sweeping guitar solos or superstar guests, but there is feedback and a touch of the blues mixed in.  Hendrix’ influence on electric guitar and music lives strong even in this ADD world we live.

More Grammy Fallout

Since the Grammys last weekend, there has been a lot of post-Grammy chatter online and publicly (though I guess both act congruently now).  Most of the buzz has been positive, at least from my friends and coworkers.  I think most were fine with the Arcade Fire winning Album of the Year.  Justin Bieber not winning was a shock, but personally I was glad of that.  Most people liked the performances.  Lady Gaga’s new song “Born This Way” sounds eerily like Madonna’s “Express Yourself”.  All in all, a lot of people tuned in, and I think it was for the most part a good show.

Then this morning I read that Steve Stoute, a veteran marketing and music executive (Stoute is the manager of rapper Nas, a highly respected artist who has enjoyed critical and commercial success), publishes in the New York Times on Sunday a scathing advertisement against the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences and the Grammys for “losing touch with contemporary culture and failing to acknowledge the talents of hugely successful artists like Justin Bieber and Eminem” (see http://insidetv.ew.com/2011/02/20/music-exec-slams-grammys-for-snubbing-justin-bieber-eminem/). Stoute also made comments that criticized how the producers picked certain artists to perform that contradicted the system of voting that determines who wins.  Essentially he was arguing that they asked artists like Bieber and Eminem to perform just to boost ratings despite the fact that neither won one of the bigger awards.

Stoute’s argument in this case essentially sounds to me like he would rather the artists of major labels be recognized rather than artists of independent labels.  His reasoning is part of the reasoning why I tuned OUT from the Grammys years ago.  For far too long I believe major label artists of sub-par quality have been picked over indie label artists of above-par quality.  He argues that Justin Bieber should have won New Artist of the Year over actual winner Esperanza Spalding, stating that his “cultural impact and success are even more quantifiable if you factor in his YouTube and Vevo viewership….”  I emboldened “quantifiable” because that’s exactly how he sees importance—by the numbers rather than the substance.  I’m sorry, but there is nothing about Justin Bieber’s music that inspires me.  His story is fascinating, and he is a talented artist, but he is not a talented songwriter, at least not yet.  His songs seem shallow and immature, which is great for a younger audience but does little for an older, more mature audience.

This is not to say that Bieber has no impact on adults.  I am sure there are millions of adults who love his music, the simplicity of it, and would rather have his music any day over someone of Esperanza Spalding’s ilk.  That’s their prerogative.  But to me people like Stoute and others are looking at a “who’s sold the most, who’s on TV the most” artist/band rather than a substantive artist/band.  I would argue that of the list of artists that were nominated for Best New Artist (Bieber, Spalding, Drake, Florence & the Machine and Mumford & Sons), Drake probably most deserved it.  He would be a more ideal balance of popularity and depth than the other artists.

While Stoute doesn’t directly question Arcade Fire’s Suburbs winning Album of the Year, he does question their being picked to perform right before the announcement of the Album of the Year award.  This does seem a little suspect, but it’s not exactly a new concept.  I am certain (though have not researched to confirm) that at least once an artist that has been nominated for Best Original Song on a Motion Picture at the Oscar’s has also performed right before winning the award.  I did question Arcade Fire’s choice of “Month of May” to perform but figured that was the artist using leverage in order to perform.

I admit I was shocked (in a good way) that Arcade Fire won over Eminem and Lady Antebellum.  I thought both Eminem and Arcade Fire were underdogs in the category since Lady Antebellum had already won two awards earlier in the evening.  Eminem’s record Recovery is a very good record and one of my favorites of his.  I think he shows immense depth at attacking his own demons rather than those of others (as he used to) and assumed that the album would follow the typical Grammy trend and win (based on popularity).  Recovery is good, but The Suburbs is better.  Really all of those bands were fortunate that Janelle Monáe’s ArchAndroid album and Kanye’s My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy weren’t nominated in that category because those albums were better.

I despise the hypocrisy on both sides (Stoute along with other major label execs as well as the RIAA and the Grammys) to be honest.  Both sides have frequently fought off more talented artists and picked the “flavor of the moment” for winning awards.  If they want to make that argument, then make the Billboard Awards a bigger deal.  Those awards are based on popularity and sales.  The Grammys should be about awarding artistic excellence regardless of sales.  When award ceremonies start awarding artists based on artistic integrity and depth, I’ll tune in.  Chances are this will never happen again.

Grammy Wrap-Up

I’m not going to while away about what the artists and entertainers were wearing, but I wanted to take a little time to talk about the Grammys.  I’ve long disliked the Grammys because I felt like major label bands were the only ones ever in consideration, and this is still basically true, though this is starting to change (see more later).  I should also clarify that when I refer to “major labels” I mean the primary mass record distributor for a particular genre.  I felt that there were some fantastic records released by independent labels (further known as “indies”) that deserved far greater attention.  I still think this is true.

I also hated the Grammys because back in the day of Napster the president of the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) made some obnoxious remarks about how free online file downloads were ruining the industry and preventing major labels from distributing their artists’ music.  While I understand the position he took and how file sharing was taking money away from the artists, I also have argued that the business itself needed to and has to change to catch up with technology and youth in general.  I think the hardest thing they had to deal with is that technology advanced fantastically in a short period of time.  They didn’t want to accept that things were changing, that bands and record companies needed to find other sources of revenue besides physical albums.   The fact that he made this statement annoyed me to no end and basically turned me off completely from the shows.

My anger started to subside a couple of years ago, and I have caught patches of the shows.  I’ve rarely if ever used the Grammys to determine what music to listen to since most indies were shunned.  However, the diversity of artists that were represented started to intrigue me, so I started to watch.  This year’s show did a better job of holding my interest, at least in the artists who actually won.

First, Album of the Year going to the Arcade Fire’s The Suburbs was a major win to me.  The record was released by Merge Records, an indie label that has been around for a long time.  Like most indies, though, Merge had never had a Grammy winner.  This win was a major coup for the indies.  Hopefully more focus will be given to their albums as well as other independent record label albums.

Second, Cee-Lo should have won for “Forget You”.  That song to me was the catchiest song I have heard in a long time, and I only just heard it four months ago.  Sure it’s a revenge song, but he does it with such straight-faced giddiness that I can’t help but like it.  In fact, that entire album deserves some more credit because it is a very solid album from beginning to end with great singing and music.

Third, Lady Gaga is rehashing old Madonna tunes.  It’s true, you cannot deny it.  “Born This Way” is “Express Yourself” all over again.  Even the underlying themes are practically the same.  While I acknowledge she has some talent, I worry that this is a pattern that will continue.  Some of her earlier stuff has harkened to Madonna’s glory days.  And her gimmicks certainly also reflect Madonna’s influence, though Gaga takes it further.

Fourth, the Black Keys won three awards on Sunday, though none were done live.  Though I like a lot of their music, Brothers was their first release to really gain popular acclaim.  So long as they don’t lose sight of who they were when they were just two making lo-fi blues records, they can do no wrong in my eyes.

I enjoyed the performances of a few artists on Sunday night.  Janelle Monae, whose ArchAndroid record is fantastic, was electric and has a great voice.  Bruno Mars, despite the fact that I really am not a fan of his music, exudes the soul of the late 1960s, so I have to give him props here.  Mumford & Sons performed as well as they usually do.  Eminem with Rhianna and Dr. Dre also did an awesome job.  Eminem was the only other band I would have liked to see win Record of the Year.  Recovery is a different record for him but a very good record.

Hopefully next year’s ceremonies will be as good as this year’s.  I think that if the organization shifts some of its focus away from the majors and looks at some indies, I think they’ll do all of us a favor.